Friday, March 5, 2010

Governance Part 3: Policies

In Part 2, we discussed the Missions, Visions, and Charters, which define a task, lay out an overall strategy for accomplishing that task, and authorize someone to do it. Today, we’ll discuss how policies tell everyone to execute the charter to accomplish the mission that realizes the vision. (If I can make this into a spoof of The Court of King Caractacus, why not?).

Humor aside, a policy is a high level statement from senior management to the enterprise describing how it expects everyone to conduct business.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Risk management example: my tire

I was going continue the governance series today by writing about policies, but I had the idea to use my last few days to show how theory turns into practice. In particular, how I think about and do risk management in day-to-day life. I’m sure you do the same thing, but call it by a different name. “Thinking things through,” perhaps. The really cool thing about it is that it takes longer to describe than to actually do – and if it’s that reflexive for some things, it can become reflexive for everything.

Meta: Comments now hosted at Intense Debate

I've set up the comments to use the Intense Debate system. This will add threading, a degree of cross-site identity continuity, and a number of other features to the system.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Risk Management: YOU Are a risk manager!

Risk management. Assessment, Vulnerabilities, threats, and impact. Mitigation, assignment, acceptance. If you don’t do security for a living, or do it as a purely technical activity, these can sound like terms from some arcane art practiced by Wizards, Sorcerers, Actuaries, and Mutual Fund managers. Today we start taking the mystique out of it and showing that it’s something nearly everyone does every day.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Spycamgate followup

I’ve written previously about “Spycamgate,” wherein a school administrator tried to hold a student accountable for perceived behavior at home based on images taken from a camera on the student’s school-issued laptop. The school’s defense is that the webcams are a security feature to track down lost or stolen machines. If so, the school is illustrating how not to do security. In this instance, doing security wrong consists of doing security in a way that is disrespectful of other people’s security. The case for the importance of meticulously respecting other people’s security is simple to make: there are civil and criminal laws against disrespecting other people’s security:

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Security Without Tears or Apology

In plugging this blog, for which I’m grateful, Avedon Carol mentioned that my subtitle “Security without apology or tears” doesn’t necessarily make immediate sense. I thought I’d spend some time talking about that.

Every time I tell someone I do information security for a living,

Friday, February 19, 2010

School Principal Spys on Children at Home via Laptop Camera

Whichever side of the infosec coin one is on, a jargon we use to refer to the control of a system is ownership. We refer to a system as “compromised” or “owned” or “pwned” if the person who owns it isn’t also the person who owns it in the legal sense of the term. Most information security practice is concerned with preventing and detecting inappropriate changes in ownership-with-a-p.